90 Miter Bend With Vanes

■ FIGURE 8.29 Loss coefficient for a typical conical diffuser (Ref. 5).

V8.5 Car exhaust system

Extensive tables are available for loss coefficients of standard pipe components.

A2/A1, specific details of the geometry, and the Reynolds number. The data are often presented in terms of a pressure recovery coefficient, Cp = (p2 — p1)/(pV^/2), which is the ratio of the static pressure rise across the diffuser to the inlet dynamic pressure. Considerable effort has gone into understanding this important topic (Refs. 11, 12).

Flow in a conical contraction (a nozzle; reverse the flow direction shown in Fig. 8.29) is less complex than that in a conical expansion. Typical loss coefficients based on the downstream (high-speed) velocity can be quite small, ranging from KL = 0.02 for U = 30°, to Kl = 0.07 for U = 60°, for example. It is relatively easy to accelerate a fluid efficiently.

Bends in pipes produce a greater head loss than if the pipe were straight. The losses are due to the separated region of flow near the inside of the bend (especially if the bend is sharp) and the swirling secondary flow that occurs because of the imbalance of centripetal forces as a result of the curvature of the pipe centerline. These effects and the associated values of Kl for large Reynolds number flows through a 90° bend are shown in Fig. 8.30. The friction loss due to the axial length of the pipe bend must be calculated and added to that given by the loss coefficient of Fig. 8.30.

For situations in which space is limited, a flow direction change is often accomplished by use of miter bends, as is shown in Fig. 8.31, rather than smooth bends. The considerable losses in such bends can be reduced by the use of carefully designed guide vanes that help direct the flow with less unwanted swirl and disturbances.

Another important category of pipe system components is that of commercially available pipe fittings such as elbows, tees, reducers, valves, and filters. The values of KL for such components depend strongly on the shape of the component and only very weakly on the Reynolds number for typical large Re flows. Thus, the loss coefficient for a 90° elbow depends on whether the pipe joints are threaded or flanged but is, within the accuracy of the data, fairly independent of the pipe diameter, flow rate, or fluid properties (the Reynolds number effect). Typical values of KL for such components are given in Table 8.2. These typical components are designed more for ease of manufacturing and costs than for reduction of the head losses that they produce. The flowrate from a faucet in a typical house is sufficient whether the value of KL for an elbow is the typical KL = 1.5, or it is reduced to KL = 0.2 by use of a more expensive long-radius, gradual bend (Fig. 8.30).

Valves control the flowrate by providing a means to adjust the overall system loss coefficient to the desired value. When the valve is closed, the value of KL is infinite and no

Mitered Long Radius Elbow Table
Guide vanes
(b)

Character of the flow in a 90° mitered bend and the associated loss coefficient: (a) without guide vanes, (b) with guide vanes.

A valve is a variable resistance element in a pipe circuit.

fluid flows. Opening of the valve reduces KL, producing the desired flowrate. Typical cross sections of various types of valves are shown in Fig. 8.32. Some valves (such as the conventional globe valve) are designed for general use, providing convenient control between the extremes of fully closed and fully open. Others (such as a needle valve) are designed to provide very fine control of the flowrate. The check valve provides a diode type operation that allows fluid to flow in one direction only.

Loss coefficients for typical valves are given in Table 8.2. As with many system components, the head loss in valves is mainly a result of the dissipation of kinetic energy of a high-speed portion of the flow. This is illustrated in Fig. 8.33.

■ FIGURE 8.32 Internal structure of various valves: (a) globe valve, (b) gate valve, (c) swing check valve, (d) stop check valve. (Courtesy of Crane Co., Valve Division.)

(2)

■ FIGURE 8.33 Head loss in a valve is due to dissipation of the kinetic energy of the large-velocity fluid near the valve seat.

0 0

Post a comment