Summary Conclusions

1.) The GA-based tomography program is successful at calculating the time-averaged radial concentration profile from line of sight absorption measurements.

2.) The GA reconstructions of concentration RMS are quantitatively correct, giving error at some points up to 30% of the actual value for known test cases, but reproducing trends well.

3.) The LES model predicts the extent of mixing vs. downstream location quite well compared to the reconstructed experimental results, for both methane and ethane fuel.

0 0

Post a comment