Since the work requirement must be met by a prime mover that is either an electric motor or a liquid-fueled engine, the COP must be considerably greater than 3.0 in order to be an economically attractive energy source. That is true because the efficiency of the prime movers used to drive the heat pump, or to generate the electrical energy for the motor drive, have efficiencies less than 33%. The maximum theoretical COP for an i deal heat pump is given by where TL = temperature of energy source

Th = temperature of energy load

The ideal cycle, however, uses an ideal turbine as a vapor expander instead of the usual throttle valve in the expansion line of the mechanical refrigeration plant.

Figure 8.3 is a graph of the theoretical COP versus load temperature for a number of source temperatures. Several factors prevent the actual heat pump from approaching the ideal:

1. The compressor efficiency is not 100%, but is rather in the range 65 to 85%.

2. A turbine expander is too expensive to use in any but the largest units. Thus the irreversible throttling process is used instead of an ideal expansion through a turbine. All of the potential turbine work is lost to the cycle.

3. Losses occur from fluid friction in lines, compressors, and valving.

4. Higher condenser temperatures and lower evaporator temperatures than the theoretical are required to achieve practical heat flow rates from the source and into the load.

An actual two-stage industrial heat pump installation showed7 an annual average COP of 3.3 for an average source temperature of 78°F and a load temperature of 190°F. The theoretical COP is 5.8. Except for very carefully designed industrial units, one can expect to

0 0

Post a comment